Database format is standardized, and other password managers support the database format. KeepassXC (optionally synced with syncthing or your cloud provider of choice) - Portable, no need to host a server to keep the database, offline-first. A list of the options I know and would personally recommend:īitwarden (optionally with self-hosted Vaultwarden) - Best UX for the FOSS options, syncs all your devices, overall just pretty good. So, please define best, because it depends on what you're looking for. , which seemed like a point in KeePassXC's favor.
#Safeincloud pasword not working code
In any case, right now, it is easier to review KeePassXC code for security and to understand it than to do so for KeePass. That KeePass grew organically into a more complex logical structure and maybe it could enjoy some refactorings. The classes are smaller, the functions are shorter. > It is interesting to notice, that the code of KeePassXC is organized in classes cleaner than the code of KeePass in C#. , where they don't appear to claim a security-advantage. > KeePassXC, on the other hand, is developed in C++ and runs natively on all platforms giving you the best-possible platform integration. On systems other than Windows, you can run KeePass using the Mono runtime libraries, but you won't get the native look and feel which you are used to. However, it is written in C# and therefore requires Microsoft's. > KeePass is a very proven and feature-rich password manager and there is nothing fundamentally wrong with it. I mean, that sounds like a major claim, but it doesn't appear to be mentioned on either of their Wikipedia pages, in their FAQ's, nor on some of the top-results from Google.įor example, from ( ): numerous open source audits have shown that KeePassXC is far and away more secure than KeePass.
0 kommentar(er)
